Needed: More Positive Thinking?
Barbara Ehrenreich wrote an excellent book titled “Bright-Sided”. It is all about that peculiar North American cult known as the Positive Thinkers. In Chapter 2 of the book she examines the core notion of the Positive Thinkers. It is the law of attractions. “Visualize what you want and it will be attracted to you. Ask, believe, and receive, or name it and claim it.” All of this is set out in a run-away bestseller “The Secret” by Rhonda Byrne. The Secret makes the claim, implicitly and explicitly, that you can manipulate the physical world through your thoughts and feelings.
The purest form of positive thinking was practiced by the Cargo Cults of New Guinea and nearby islands. In the 1940’s and 1950’s the indigenous people observed that the Japanese and Westerners possessed a massive quantity of manufactured goods or cargo. Unacquainted with the modern manufacturing process they assumed that cargo was produced by spiritual means and that they could similarly obtain such cargo for themselves through spiritual agents. They carried out various rituals including setting up of mock airports with military-style landing strips, life-size replicas of airplanes made out of straw, offices, and dining rooms and men on the ground with headsets with bamboo antennas.
Westerners laughed at the Cargo Cultists but the New Guineans were really of one and the same ilk as our Cult of Positive Thinkers. In fact the Cargo Cultists were much more forgivable since they were isolated from the science and technology that would have made manufactured goods understandable. There was a logic in equating cargo with magic.
Now what is the connection between Nanaimo and the Cult of Positive Thinkers? It is this: Nanaimo’s civic affairs has been heavily influenced by Positive Thinkers for many years. The Friends of Plan Nanaimo (FPN) experienced the local Cult of Positive Thinkers during the debate over the building of the Conference Centre. All of the facts and figures that FPN mustered with respect to the project were instantly labeled as “negative”. The Conference Centre proceeded notwithstanding there was not a lot of evidence to support its short term or even long term viability. The project was an act of mind over matter faith – akin to the faith of the Cargo Cultists. Build a Conference Centre and it will ATTRACT the conventioneers! Ironically, its post-opening troubles have even been blamed on insufficient positive thinking – on those bad thoughts being projected by the skeptics, the “nattering nabobs of negativity”, the people who dare to point out the Centre’s poor economics. Gord Fuller and Ron Bolin are the reason for the poor bookings, not Nanaimo’s awkward location or the abundance of competing facilities.
Barbara Ehrenreich says “The alternative to positive thinking is not, however, despair.” Instead “Human intellectual progress, such as it has been, results from our long struggle to see things as they are or in the most universally comprehensible way, and not as projections of our own emotions”. In other words what is needed is a commitment to realism, a willingness to turn over every stone to see what is underneath it, a preparedness to ask the tough, critical and often not very nice questions.
Let’s return once again to Nanaimo’s relentless gang of cheerleaders – the people who tell you this is paradise on earth, who cheer every big expenditure of civic funds and who are the ever eager promoters of projects like the Conference Centre. All of their positive thinking unfortunately has not altered this town’s economic and social realities. It hasn’t changed bad economics into good economics; it hasn’t brought in thousands of tourists; it hasn’t vanquished poverty and hunger; it hasn’t created a Downtown which is alive after 7 in the evening, it hasn’t prevented the closing of long existing restaurants.
In fact in the context of Nanaimo the positive thinkers have probably had a significant damaging role. The fault with Positive Thinking is that it does not help to bring real solutions to real problems. Instead the problems and deficiencies are glossed over and yesterday’s strategy is today’s strategy and will be tomorrow’s strategy.
We need to look realistically at the Downtown and its commercial struggles and social problems. We need to acknowledge that Commercial St. is dead after 7, that it remains a problematic location for businesses and that it lacks a lively street scene even in the middle of the summer. We need to look realistically at the barren gasoline alley that runs through the heart of the Downtown. We need to look realistically at the many vacant, weed filled lots that can be found throughout the central and near south parts of the City. We need to look realistically at the likely economic factors (bad and good) that will impact on not only the future of the Downtown but the City as a whole.
The ultimate irony, of course, is that through the negativity of realism we can have genuine, positive change.
P.S. There is one group of positive thinkers in Nanaimo who actually do get what they imagine. They can be found in the vicinity of Franklin and Wallace Street. These people imagine a lovely, new building to replace their patched together, worn out 1950’s building and lo and behold it happens. Then they imagine how nice it would be to have new furniture to accompany the fancy new offices and these positive thoughts are also magically effective. More positive thoughts result in expensive new electric vehicles and electric plug-ins to recharge them. So nice to be a zero emission hero when it is not your own money that is being spent. Further thoughts about a river once again running wild through the southern environs of the City causes century old dams to disappear. So perhaps I shouldn’t be so negative. For certain people positive thinking does ATTRACT all sorts of things that they want.
I Google Colliery park today: I haven’t been up there for ages but it looks pretty much the same.
Why is management recommending demolition of the dams? Is it another make work boondoggle?
The dams have been there for decades and maintenance should be house keeping not a cause célèbre.
Are they silted up enough so the lake won’t drain? There is hardly the possibility of a failure and deluge!
Leave the bloody things alone: they are very pleasant artifacts!
Colliery Dam Park is only one issue, the annex is another, and the way council pussy foots around management shows it has no control and in fact doesn’t know what is going on. Smug, polite complacency hardly describes council’s performance: gossiping on Nanaimo City Hall blog ditto.
I am not at all impressed by council’s cool contrived politeness. It is veiled do-nothing; fear of what management has in its closet. Even the young Cllr Anderson has turned out to be a dud: far too intent on protocol.
Friends of Plan Nanaimo at least had the gonads to face intractable power: construction/real estate/unions. Nanaimo is fated with old age pensioners (unfortunately like me) happily mowing the lawn as one or two ineffectually gossip on line.
A real council would start 2013 calling in all senior management contracts on the basis of non-performance. Some would be fired some would receive salary reductions. All would be reprimanded and warned.
http://www.theyorkshirelad.ca/5poetry/The%20Boat/boat.html
Now that’s real thinquing . . .
Happy New Year 2013.
Many a fortune has been accumulated by the purveyors of “positive thinking”, while the pockets of the curious are emptied of more noble purpose. “The Secret” of this reality is not lost on Rhonda Byrne, as she is no doubt laughing all the way to the bank while you Mr. Brown are struggling with the idea. The P.S. people are employed in your service. If you do not like what they are doing then you should make the necessary effort to bring about the change that you imagine is required. This can be done if you have a mind for it. After all, the City that we inhabit is nothing more than the history of our people, and the interplay of countless ideas.
Re Colliery Dam: https://www.facebook.com/#!/groups/SAVEcollierydams/?bookmark_t=group
1132 members to date; many positive thinkers :)
My Facebook Group – Municipally (A)MUSING: https://www.facebook.com/#!/groups/112340092206683/?bookmark_t=group
More, I hope, positive thinkers :)
There are a number of these groups out there trying their best for the betterment all who live in the Municipality; trick is pulling them all together :)
Re: Colliery dams. If seismic studies were conducted over several decades why were they allowed to deteriorate to the point of demolition?
Re: Colliery dams. If seismic studies were conducted over several decades why were they allowed to deteriorate to the point of demolition?
Possibly for the same reason that the sewer,water & road infrastructure is in a similar condition.
That is to say that pet projects have more often than not been given priority .
This is what happens when we build it & they will come rather than we will build “when” they come.
A “Happier” new years to everyone.
Speaking of Roads, the highway through Nanaimo is a mess:) HAPPIEST OF NEW YEARS FOLK:)
To Joe. In democratic theory the elected legislature or council make the big decisions and directs a paid adminstration to carry them out. In the real world it is often very different. The tail wags the dog in the sense that it is management in the public service who are the prime decision makers and the councillors provide a somewhat passive oversight. At the local governmnet level the role of councillors and administrators varies greatly from municipality to municipality. In Vancouver it is the vision of Vision (whether you agree with it or not) which seems to be paramount. When Vision took over from the NPA there was significantly a change in the top administrators.
Politics abhors a power vacuum and in Nanaimo the show is very definitely run by the administrators. How many of the elected councillors ran on a platform to build a 14 million dollar office complex? How many of the elected councillors ran on a platform to remove the Colliery Dams? Virtually all major spending and policy initiatives in the post-Korpan era have originated in the bureaucracy. And our bureaucrats are certainly not shy about spending. There is now a GUARANTEED huge run-up in property taxes over the next ten years.
Typically City councilors are skilfully manipulated. You want a new office building then you get an engineering firm to say that the existing building might collapse in a major earthquake event. Every engineer in town will tell you that two-thirds of the buildings in or near downtown Nanaimo including a couple of major, highly used churches, several medium-rise apartment buildings and virtually every old structure along Commercial Street or the Hi-way would be equally or more vulnerable if there was a close-by major eathquake.
A major part of the problem is that eight councillors and a mayor have no collective (and not much individual) vision for the City. Consequently at best they provide a weakly passive oversight.
Ron Bolin is quite correct – the only way for council to regain control of decision making is via a disciplined, municipal political party.
David,
Councilors can not be expected to know everything there is to know about running a City. It is your responsibility to help them when you have more in depth knowledge about an issue than anyone else including staff and consultants. You don’t need to run on a platform and get yourself elected to make a contribution. You just have to do the research and write the story. What’s the narrative anyway? If folks are constantly trying to keep up with you just to look good doing their job, well then you have made the point haven’t you? Somebody is going to notice.
Joe:
Perhaps you could fill us in on the effect you think you and your ideas have had on City Council and how you managed to get their attention. I certainly know the effect that I think mine have had….
“Councilors can not be expected to know everything there is to know about running a City.” That is true Joe but they should follow thru on their election promises. To wit: I voted for Cllr Ted Grieves twice, once in the by-election then the subsequent civic election on the basis of his promise to rejuvenate downtown. Since his election not a word and downtown still essentially languishes as it has for a decade.
“ . . . and how you managed to get their attention.” asks Ron.
I am a qualified professional planner with decades of experience, and I like to thinq quite talented. My ideas for a Nanaimo plan have been posted on line . . .
http://www.theyorkshirelad.ca/2renewnan/front.html
. . . for a over five years. The plan is not definitive but it is worth a conversation. Yet, it is as though anyone’s sincere attempts to move the conversation forward are treated with clammed up resentment. No one pretends to notice. No one cares. We live in Nanaimo!
David Brown reminds us, “How many of the elected councillors ran on a platform to build a 14 million dollar office complex? How many of the elected councilors ran on a platform to remove the Colliery Dams? Virtually all major spending and policy initiatives in the post-Korpan era have originated in the bureaucracy.” Very good points!
Councilors should, however, be expected to thinq creatively and stand by their commitments whatever they may be . . .
Frank Murphy and I went to great lengths to seek support for a visit from governor of Parana Br, mayor of Curitiba and world-renowned planner Jaime Lerner to visit Nanaimo. Both then mayor Korpan and, still incumbent, director of planning Tucker gave us encouragement. I visited, then private citizen, John Ruttan for support. All we got from him was some waffling nonsense about his intentions to run for mayor sometime or another.
On my return from Curitiba with the good news Gov. Lerner was enthusiastic well, the rest was a led balloon . . .
http://members.shaw.ca/rogerkemblesnr/curitiba/curitiba.html
Imagine the boost across Canada and beyond that a world famous planner was making waves in little old Nanaimo . . . wow!
Well, Korpan booked off sick at the COW meeting, Cllr Holdom sneered and Tucker came on with the usual brazen bureaucratics enough to make a priest disavow: enough to make one disgusted that such is on the city pay roll. Someone’s brittle turf was about to be trampled!
David Brown: “Ron Bolin is quite correct – the only way for council to regain control of decision making is via a disciplined, municipal political party.” ecept that is not the end of the story. Mayor and council must also have something to offer the city before they stand for election!
Don’t thinq too positively in Nanaimo. It’ll break your heart!
Roger, You said a mouthful! After watching, and then participating at Nanaimo Council, for years I have no faith in our politician’s promises. Staff runs the show, and I am sure that the senior staff has more lobbyists than the Council.
“This makes readers of this site unique. In my 35 years of experience in journalism, I have found that most readers read in order to confirm what they already think and believe. It is the same for the right-wing and the left-wing. They cannot escape their ideological boxes and are creatures of their biases. They want their prejudices vindicated and their beliefs supported. A writer who tells them something that they do not want to hear receives abuse. These readers cannot benefit from facts and new information and change their minds. They already know everything and only want information that supports their beliefs and advances their agendas. ” Paul Craig Roberts, January 03, 2013.
“Et tu” Nanaimo City Bloggers . . . Don’t be too smug.
While continually working towards bigger goals take heart in the smaller that are accomplished. That is what keeps me going:)
PS;
It is after all Municipally (A)musing https://www.facebook.com/#!/groups/112340092206683/?bookmark_t=group
There was absolutely no discussion of the Disposition of our old City Annex for $1 dollar, along with $40,000 in tax relief on the property to the new “owners”. Owners is in quotes as set conditions must be met before the final transfer of the property.
Positive thinking would reach new heights to understand this rationale; or would it?
The constant calls to give away taxpayer payed for assets ;Hotel land ,Annex,& now the Water front lands ( as per NDN calls for a Multiplex) are reaching epidemic proportions.
However there is a sucker born every minute is there not?
It is time that the City gets out of the land development business; such activity is a misappropriation of tax payer money. It is not supported by public policy.
Two bids were received, the winning bid: one dollar.
We might well ask what then was the losing bid, what could be lower? Fifty cents maybe? Why accept such a bid?
The bottom line in reality: prime real estate for the cost of demolition.
@Trailblazer. Eighty-five thousand suckers comes to mind. No doubt that whatever deal the City makes it will have the same tight legal language and security backup that allowed $3,500,000.00 (unrecoverable) to be paid to Millenium for essentially nothing.