Ron Bolin: March 5, 2012
The first FPCOW meeting to be held at the VICC took place this afternoon. The Commission Reports on Public Art selection; Travel Assistance Grant Changes, and the Minutes of the Parks. Recreation and Culture Committee were accepted as presented.
The Conflict of Interest policy as recommended by Staff was accepted after some discussion and with a strenuous, and I thought, well reasoned objection from Councillor Anderson. Councillor Anderson had made calls to Councillors in other jurisdictions to determine their conflict of interest policy, but only found one. All others did not have such a policy, leaving Councillors to determine such matters for themselves. He asked for an extension of a week to consider his position and his findings, but was defeated in this request, though joined by Councillors Pattje and McKay. In the end Councillor Anderson’s was the only vote against staff’s recommendation to offer each Councillor in each year up to $3000 in automatic legal opinion costs regarding the possibility of conflict of interest. The recommendation noted that more money could be provided for such opinions at Council’s discretion.
Council’s interest in this matter became much clearer during question period when Mr. Kenning pointed out that while a conflict of interest question might be found in a court of law, if the offending Councillor had a legal opinion (not a legal decision, but an opinion for a lawyer), even if he or she were to be found guilty, that they would not lose their seat on Council. Read the rest of this entry »

