NANAIMO CITY HALL BLOG

Archive for July, 2012|Monthly archive page

Nanaimo’s One Per Centers

In CITY FINANCE, CITY GOVERNMENT, SOCIAL ISSUES on July 30, 2012 at 12:09 am

David Brown: July 29, 2012

There is a new group of one per centers in B.C. They are not the captains of private industry but rather our managers in civic and provincial government.

In Canada a One Per Center is someone with an annual income over $230,000.00. An article in Tyee scopes the number of municipal bureaucrats who are now in the privileged top 1%. They include George Duncan, the chief administrative officer of Richmond, B.C. who earns $267,613, Penny Ballem, Vancouver’s city manager at $324,110 and Kelowna’s Ron Mattiussi who makes $247,149.  Nanaimo’s own Al Kenning with a salary of $223,000 has not quite made it into the Exclusive One Per center Club but he is getting close. The Tyee article also notes that since 2007 Victoria’s executive salaries have risen by up to 76 per cent. Read the rest of this entry »

Asking the Right Questions

In LETTERS TO THE LOCAL PRESS on July 5, 2012 at 2:21 pm

Letter to the Editor: re: Survey seeks visitors’ thoughts about Maffeo Sutton Park

By Staff Writer – Nanaimo News Bulletin
Published: July 05, 2012 8:00 AM

Let me be among the first to laud our Parks and Recreation Department and the lands and assets that it manages on our behalf, but…  I took the survey, and I just couldn’t stomach the cool aid.

What I mean by this is that there are a couple of hidden assumptions buried in the survey that really need to be brought to the surface before there can be any reasonable discussion.  One is that the park needs more improvements despite the fact that the “improvements” recently completed weren’t, at least in the minds of many, improvements, nor have they been in place long enough to really determine what else might need to be done.  It may, in fact, really be a dangling financial matter in which the phase 2 funds which have been held over are burning up in the pocket of the budget.

The other is the hidden suggestion that improvements are effectively free.  There is an extensive list of possible “improvements” for check-off in the survey and none of them show any cost at all. Read the rest of this entry »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 40 other followers