NANAIMO CITY HALL BLOG

Archive for September, 2010|Monthly archive page

Berry Pay Hike

In CITY FINANCE, CITY GOVERNMENT, LETTERS TO THE LOCAL PRESS on September 30, 2010 at 10:36 am

Ron Bolin — September 30, 2010


Letter to the Editor, Nanaimo Daily News:

Derek Spaldings “Former city manager will get increase to severance payout” is indeed a stick in the City’s eye, but it is hard to see how the city can keep him from getting an increase better than 3 times that of our still serving  senior staff given the wording of the agreement made with him:

“Jerry Berry (the “Employee”) will receive severance in the form of salary continuance for a 24 month period, (the “Severance Period”) commencing on the date of acceptance of these terms, where salary increases are annual as of January 1 each year as set by “Hay” based on the Employee’s points at 100 per cent, and where the Employee’s salary will not be reduced below its current level.”

Heads he wins, tails we lose. If the Hay system raises the bar he gets the raise. If, incomprehensibly, Hay were to go negative, he is guaranteed against reduction. We have a Council, a Human Resources Department and legal advisor(s) all of which overlooked the implications of that to which they had agreed.

The joker in all this is the Hay system. While pay and benefit packages for government employees at all levels have been noted to be some 30 or more percent greater than for similar jobs in the private sector and benefits are platinum, we continue to subscribe to its use.  The circularity of the system, in which raises by one authority are spread to all others which then set off a new round of raises independently from circumstances leads inevitably to a daisy chain reaction of salary and benefit excesses.

The wild card in this situation is that senior staff accepted a 1.5% cap rather than the 4.9% dictated by Hay. Staff’s move toward moderation is noted.  Hopefully the Hay system is dead.

Home

Tax Sale Policy Well Conceived??

In CITY FINANCE, CITY GOVERNMENT, LETTERS TO THE LOCAL PRESS, QUESTIONS TO COUNCIL, STAFF on September 29, 2010 at 3:26 pm

Ron Bolin — September, 29, 2010
Darrell Bellart’s story in today’s Daily News: “Tax sale policy well conceived” fails to make its case. While embroidering the concept, the fundamental nature of the obligations which the city has taken on is absent. For example:

  • Were the houses we have purchased owner occupied, rented or vacant and as they are all now, in effect, rental properties, who gets the rent for these city owned houses?
  • Are they encumbered by mortgages or other pledges and who pays those mortgages or pledges now?
  • Who pays the insurance on these properties?
  • Is there a fixed term for which the city will carry these properties before taking possession, i.e. the same as the one year moratorium currently in effect? Or does the city have longer range plans?
  • The province has a number of tax deferral programs at very low rates, i.e. less than one can make on a secure bank investment or savings bond. Why aren’t they used by the owners and if they do not use them are they likely to ever be able to repay the back taxes and fees to the city?
  • Does this move by the city, as the tax deferral programs seem to do, make money for the deferrer as the final repayments are below the rate of return on the money saved?
  • Is this a method by which the city can Read the rest of this entry »

NIMBY Noise Makers Are in the Minority

In LETTERS TO THE LOCAL PRESS, SOCIAL ISSUES on September 29, 2010 at 1:10 pm

Gord Fuller — September 29, 2010
Editor: Nanaimo Daily News

Re: ‘Neighbours don’t want low-cost housing nearby‘ (Daily News, Sept. 14) and ‘Rich end of Nanaimo has its share of problems’ (Daily News, Sept 20)

Sooner or later the dreaded term NIMBY will rear its ugly head when associated with these three recent stories. I have mentioned before that I believe those that are true NIMBYs are in the minority and, much like those they often accuse of abusing the social system, occupy an extremely small niche when it comes to categorizing human behaviour. So far I believe the letters and other comments show a true concern for this community.

As an advocate for social change and the overall decentralization of services to avoid concentration and ghettoization of any area, it behooves the city to enter into open discussion with the neighbourhood. It is Read the rest of this entry »

Four Year Terms for Council?

In CITY GOVERNMENT, EMAILS TO MAYOR / COUNCILLORS, LETTERS TO THE LOCAL PRESS, MUNICIPAL/PROVINCIAL AFFAIRS on September 24, 2010 at 8:48 am

Ron Bolin —  September 24, 2010
Letter to the Editor:

Tom Fletcher’s piece, “Municipal politicians to vote on four-year elected terms”  (Bulletin, Sept. 23, 2010) raises an important question: When was the public asked for their approval to give four year terms to municipal politicians?  Does the public have any say in this matter or have we somehow given permission to our elected city officials to give themselves a longer reprieve against our disapproval?

The U.S. House of Representatives must ask the public for their approval every two years.  For a century, Nanaimo Councils were elected annually, then came 2, 3 and now proposed 4 year terms in rapid succession. Do we feel that our oversight is no longer required so frequently as we all approve of what is happening to our town?  Are elections so onerous that raising money for elections is getting harder for the businesses and unions which are their primary funders?  Who should be voting on four year terms, the governors or the governed?  Is this the kind of vote that we are sending our Councillors to Whistler to take on our behalf?  Should we not be demanding our say in this matter?

Ron Bolin

Home

Size Doesn’t Matter But Style Does

In PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT on September 23, 2010 at 12:30 pm

Blog reader J.Olson contributed this comment to Dan Appell’s post Draft: Newcastle + Brechin Neighbourhood Plan. Posted here for further discussion.

Size doesn’t matter but style does. The comparison between the two projects as offered is irrelevant. Both projects are mall redevelopments, both are mixed use projects, both have vehicle access through the development site. The planning frameworks for these projects are however quite different and this is where style does matter.

There are several points to be made in the case of Oakridge Mall;

• All major projects in Vancouver are required to provide 20% non-market housing and to provide park space at a rate of 2.75 acres per 1000 population. These obligations are non-negotiable.

• The Oakridge Policy Statement does not confer development rights or height allowances, these rights will be the subject of a future project based public re-zoning process, followed by a Development Permit process.

• The City will require a road dedication as a condition of re-zoning and this also is not negotiable.

• The Oakridge Policy Statement is the result of a very public process. It is a design process characterized by negotiations between the Read the rest of this entry »

Tax Revolt! California’s Proposition 13

In CITY FINANCE, CITY GOVERNMENT on September 23, 2010 at 12:20 pm

Frank Murphy — September 23, 2010
I wanted to follow up on a point Ron made in a comment on the post How Much Freight Can Average Taxpayer Pay. He issued the challenge: “Perhaps we could begin with some suggestions about specifically which budget items might be cut.”

It occurred to me that the greater challenge might be to identify where best to spend, what areas are underfunded — hidden false economies like neglected maintenance that will bite us down the road.

Those interested in municipal taxation issues will want to look at California’s experience after its tax-revolt Proposition 13 that rolled back property taxes, capped them at 1 percent of purchase price, and limited yearly increases to 2 percent. Basing municipal taxation on property market value assessments has all kinds of problems but a lot of people think that Proposition 13 resulted in the disaster that is current California with entire counties Read the rest of this entry »

How Much Freight Can Average Taxpayer Pay?

In CITY FINANCE on September 21, 2010 at 12:49 pm

Jim Taylor — September 21, 2010
I posted the following on my blog www.nanaimo-info-blog.com today which came out of yesterdays council meeting.

How Much Freight Can Average Taxpayer Pay?

One of the things discussed at yesterdays city council meeting was regards the problems some municipalities are facing as a result of industry either closing or in some cases refusing to pay their full tax bill.

An example given were our friends in Port Alberni where the residential taxes went up 25% to cover the loss of taxes no longer coming from industry.

The problem would not be as acute in Nanaimo as approximately 4% of total taxes are paid by industry. There is the desire provincially to reduce the ratio of taxes paid by industry when compared with residential taxes. In this case Nanaimo is ahead of some other municipalities as we had already started to reduce the amount of taxes industry is paying.

The net result regardless of how you want to slice it, is there will be a continuing increasing burden of taxes being shifed to the residential taxpayers in our cities as industry pushes for lower taxes, or simply close shop and move elsewhere.

In Nanaimo there is a relatively small industrial tax base, however a large percentage of city taxes are paid by the commercial or business sector. This fact was pointed out at yesterday’s city council meeting.

The point which was not made, was the fact that commercial taxpayers don’t actually pay the taxes, rather they collect their taxes from their customers, which of course is once again the average taxpayer.

So you could argue that there is really only ONE taxpayer in the province. Perhaps they will come to the same place as industry has, in that they will simply pay what taxes they think is fair, and take the city to court to lower the bill.

Home

Draft: Newcastle + Brechin Neighbourhood Plan

In PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT on September 20, 2010 at 9:23 am

Dan Appell —  September 20, 2010
The Brechin Hill neighbourhood plan steering committee just gave me a copy of the draft of the “Newcastle + Brechin Neighbourhood Plan.” The steering committee has had it for about three days.

I’ve had a brief look at it, and I was exposed to the raw, exhausted emotion of the steering committee. From what I’ve seen, I would say this is a neighbourhood plan in name only.

___________________________

Here are the offending bits of the draft copy of the Newcastle+Brechin Neighbourhood Plan.

These bits are key. With these bits the rest of the plan is useless as in un-do-able. Without these bits, the community might have a chance. If this was modified to conform to a Medium Density Neighbourhood then we probably would see progress. Click images to enlarge.

___________________________

The most contentious issue is waterfront development along Stewart Avenue. Here the city is allowing unlimited development with densities equal to the downtown core. This is so destabilizing, as far as the neighbourhoods Read the rest of this entry »

eMail Exchange with Planner Tucker re: Sept 14 eMail

In PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT on September 17, 2010 at 12:50 pm

Frank Murphy — September 17, 2010

The first of the emails is my response to Andrew’s email. You may want to read his reply to my September 14 email first which appears second in the thread…

Subject: Vancouver’s Oakridge redevelopment
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:39:51 -0700
From: Frank Murphy <frankmurphy@shaw.ca>
To: Andrew Tucker <Andrew.Tucker@nanaimo.ca>
CC: Mayor&Council <Mayor&Council@nanaimo.ca>, Ted Swabey <Ted.Swabey@nanaimo.ca>, Al Kenning <Alastair.Kenning@nanaimo.ca>

Andrew — As on numerous occasions in the past you’ve responded to my questions promptly and in detail and it’s appreciated.

I anticipated that you would quite rightly point out that there is a dramatic difference in scale between the proposed Oakridge redevelopment and that of Nanaimo’s Port Place. I doubt you’d disagree though that the scale doesn’t preclude the application of the principles of inclusion involving the concerns and aspirations of each of the 3 stakeholder groups.

You have understandably addressed my concerns by recounting official policy and offer the point that these policies were developed with a certain amount of public input. If I understand correctly, I am to accept that this fulfills Council’s and the Planning Department’s responsibility to to engage in an inclusive and collaborative process on individual redevelopment applications to obtain the best possible outcome for all stakeholder groups.

In a nutshell, here’s the reasons I have been given by yourself and your department to my concerns in regards to how the Port Place redevelopment proposal unfolded.

1. We didn’t seek further public input from stakeholders such as the immediately adjacent neighbourhood associations because we were under no legal obligation to so.

2. It’s difficult

and now 3. We’re guided by policies which originally had some public input.

Governed by the same provincial legislation the City of Vancouver initiated a proactively inclusive process which offers a model for future development proposals which will find their way to your department. The model in place that guided the Port Place plan will result in mediocrity and will not meet the needs of all stakeholders.

Any reasonable, objective review of the list of Downtown Plan guiding principles would conclude that with the exception of an arguably improved linkage between downtown and the waterfront, it fails to Read the rest of this entry »

Urban Nation: Why We Need to Give Power Back to the Cities to Make Canada Strong

In CITY GOVERNMENT on September 16, 2010 at 7:24 pm

Frank Murphy — September 16, 2010
This excerpt from Urban Nation: Why We Need to Give Power Back to the Cities to Make Canada Strong offers some suggestions for the badly needed reform of municipal government.

The author is Alan Broadbent, Chair of the Canadian Maytree Foundation, which identifies itself as “committed to reducing poverty and inequality in Canada and to building strong civic communities.”

Among the Maytree Foundation’s initiatives is Ideas that Matter which is based on the wide-ranging ideas and principles of Jane Jacobs.

Jane Jacobs

Here’s background on the book: Maytree Policy in Focus newsletter.

The recommendations I thought might be a good basis for discussion here are:

Political Parties – Most cities in Canada do not have a party system. Adding a party system could help local officials articulate policy, and make the system more comprehensible to the electorate. It could also make consensus easier to obtain because of party discipline – but this is a double-edged sword. If party discipline is too strict, it could prevent a diversity of opinions from reaching council, or limit the influence of local councillors.

Mix of Ward and City-wide Councillors – In Vancouver, councillors are elected city-wide, and the electorate votes for their top 10 Read the rest of this entry »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 34 other followers